tex2html_wrap_inline199 Fractional Factorial Designs

Suppose we have seven factors. If we choose two levels per factor, we must perform tex2html_wrap_inline201 experiments.

How much information could we get from many fewer experiments - perhaps just eight?

A design with just eight experiments is called a tex2html_wrap_inline203 design.

In general, a tex2html_wrap_inline205 design is called a half-replicate of a tex2html_wrap_inline207 design. A tex2html_wrap_inline209 design is a quarter-replicate.


Example of tex2html_wrap_inline203 sign table...

Recall the tex2html_wrap_inline215 sign table...

tabular22

IF the interactions AB, AC, AD, ABCD, ..., are negligible, we can relabel the rightmost four columns by factors D,E,F,G to obtain the tex2html_wrap_inline203 table:

tabular29

The model is

displaymath211

The percent variation suggests more experiments with factors A and C. The percent variation figures apply to D, E, F, and G only if the interactions of two or more effects is negligible

Preparing the sign table for a tex2html_wrap_inline199 design...

The sign table is not always unique. Consider a tex2html_wrap_inline221 design:

tabular22

The following assignment of factor D is recommended if we believe the ABC interaction is negligible:

tabular44

However, if we believe the AB interaction is the smallest interaction, the following assignment of D is recommended:

tabular50

Confounding...

The drawback of fractional factorial designs is that the experiments only yields the combined influence of two or more effects. This is called confounding.

In first tex2html_wrap_inline205 design, example D was confounded with ABC:

displaymath225

In the bottom, D was confounded with AB:

displaymath226

In fact, in a tex2html_wrap_inline205 design, every column represents a sum of 2 effects. For example, in the first tex2html_wrap_inline205 design, for experiment i

displaymath227

In general, in a tex2html_wrap_inline199 design, tex2html_wrap_inline241 effects are confounded together:

In the previous example (top), the complete list of confoundings is:

tabular76

Algebra of confounding...

Recall the complete set of confoundings for the top tex2html_wrap_inline221 design:

tabular76

Formula I=ABCD is called the generator polynomial.

Design is called I=ABCD.

To list all other confoundings given just one confounding, multiply both sides of confounding by different terms, using two rules:

  1. For any term x, xI=x.
  2. For any term x, tex2html_wrap_inline299 .

Given generator polynomial I=ABCD:

In fact, two tex2html_wrap_inline221 designs are identified by their generator. I=ABCD is the generator for

tabular97

and I=ABD is the generator for

tabular50

Design Resolution

The order of an effect is the number of factors included in it:

tabular111

If an ith order effect is confounded with a jth order term, the confounding is said to be of order i+j:

Design resolution is minimum of orders of all confoundings.

For first tex2html_wrap_inline205 design:

tabular76

All confoundings are of order 4. Hence the resolution is 4.

A design with resolution 4 is denoted tex2html_wrap_inline345 .


Second example: The tex2html_wrap_inline221 design on the bottom contained:

tabular50

The set of all confoundings is:

tabular134

The set of all confounding orders is tex2html_wrap_inline365 . Thus the design has resolution 3 (denoted tex2html_wrap_inline367 ).

Note: Look only at generator polynomial to find resolution:

Confounding More Than Two Effects

A generator polynomial can confound more than two terms.

In general, tex2html_wrap_inline199 design confounds tex2html_wrap_inline241 effects.

Example: Reconsider tex2html_wrap_inline203 design:

tabular151

This has only eight columns. But tex2html_wrap_inline389 design needs 128 columns. Therefore 16 sets of eight columns are mapped to the above eight columns to ``collapse'' tex2html_wrap_inline389 design to tex2html_wrap_inline203 .

Thus tex2html_wrap_inline395 effects are confounded:

eqnarray157

The above equation is the generator polynomial. It arises because effect D is assigned to the column for AB, and so on:

displaymath377

This yields the generator

displaymath378

Finally, the generator polynomial is obtained by reducing all pairs of terms in the last equation so that I is on one side. For example,

displaymath379

yields I = BCDE, and so on.

Example: tex2html_wrap_inline401 design (Wang VS system)...

Case Study in [Jain, 19.2]:

Objective: decide what type of schedule should be used with three different types of workloads on a computer: word processing, interactive processing, and batch processing.

tabular166

Results and Interpretation

Results of experiments shown in Tables 19.10, 19.11 of [Jain].

Therefore, run two more experiments with:




cs5014@ei.cs.vt.edu