Suppose we have seven factors. If we choose two levels per
factor, we must perform
experiments.
How much information could we get from many fewer experiments - perhaps just eight?
A design with just eight experiments is called a
design.
In general, a
design is called a half-replicate of a
design. A
design is a quarter-replicate.
Recall the
sign table...
IF the interactions AB, AC, AD, ABCD, ..., are negligible, we
can relabel the rightmost four columns by factors D,E,F,G to
obtain the
table:
The model is
The percent variation suggests more experiments with factors A and C. The percent variation figures apply to D, E, F, and G only if the interactions of two or more effects is negligible
The sign table is not always unique. Consider a
design:
The following assignment of factor D is recommended if we believe the ABC interaction is negligible:
However, if we believe the AB interaction is the smallest interaction, the following assignment of D is recommended:
The drawback of fractional factorial designs is that the experiments only yields the combined influence of two or more effects. This is called confounding.
In first
design, example D was confounded with ABC:
In the bottom, D was confounded with AB:
In fact, in a
design, every column represents a sum of 2
effects. For example, in the first
design, for experiment i
In general, in a
design,
effects are confounded together:
In the previous example (top), the complete list of confoundings is:
Recall the complete set of confoundings for the top
design:
Formula I=ABCD is called the generator polynomial.
Design is called I=ABCD.
To list all other confoundings given just one confounding, multiply both sides of confounding by different terms, using two rules:
Given generator polynomial I=ABCD:
and so on.
In fact, two
designs are identified by their
generator. I=ABCD is the generator for
and I=ABD is the generator for
The order of an effect is the number of factors included in it:
If an ith order effect is confounded with a jth order term, the confounding is said to be of order i+j:
Design resolution is minimum of orders of all confoundings.
For first
design:
All confoundings are of order 4. Hence the resolution is 4.
A design with resolution 4 is denoted
.
The set of all confoundings is:
The set of all confounding orders is
. Thus the design has
resolution 3 (denoted
).
Note: Look only at generator polynomial to find resolution:
A generator polynomial can confound more than two terms.
In general,
design confounds
effects.
Example: Reconsider
design:
This has only eight columns. But
design needs 128 columns.
Therefore 16 sets of eight columns are mapped to the above eight
columns to ``collapse''
design to
.
Thus
effects are confounded:
The above equation is the generator polynomial. It arises because effect D is assigned to the column for AB, and so on:
This yields the generator
Finally, the generator polynomial is obtained by reducing all pairs of terms in the last equation so that I is on one side. For example,
yields I = BCDE, and so on.
Case Study in [Jain, 19.2]:
Objective: decide what type of schedule should be used with three different types of workloads on a computer: word processing, interactive processing, and batch processing.
Results of experiments shown in Tables 19.10, 19.11 of [Jain].
A (preemption), B (time slice), AB
E (fairness), A (preemption), BE, B (time slice)
A (preemption), AB, B (time slice), E (fairness)
Therefore, run two more experiments with: