Terminology


Example of no Interaction

	|	      Factor A
Factor B|	4M		16M
--------+--------------------------------
80386	|	 5		 7
80486	|	14		16

Lines are parallel in both graphs.


Example of Interaction

	|	      Factor A
Factor B|	4M		16M
--------+--------------------------------
80386	|	 5		12
80486	|	14		16

Lines are not parallel in either graph. The 80386 performance improvement is more dramatic than that of the 80486 when memory is increased from 4M to 16M. Thus processor type and memory speed interact!

  • Confounding:

    Inability to attribute a change in response variable to a factor.

    Example: In the second table above, throughput of 80386+16M was 12 (instead of 7, if there was no interaction). How much of the increase is due to

    If we measure a response, such as throughput (in MIPS), we cannot identify how much of a difference in throughput is due to CPU versus memory.


    Navigation: Previous, Up, Next