Evaluation from a Student's Perspective

 We thought it would be interesting, not only to analyze the interface of the web site but also to analyze it from a social perspective.
        The interface aspect analyzes the usability and ease of comprehension of the web site. The social aspect analyzes the usability and ease of comprehension of the web site from the perspective of a teacher and of a student. This has been done to ensure a more holistic evaluation of the web site.
        From a teacher's perspective, the site has been evaluated for its usefulness as a teaching tool and from a students' perspective, for its usefulness and ease of comprehension to a student in achieving the daily concerns of finding information on the course, course policies, assignments, textbooks, resources etc. and getting motivated to performing more successfully in the course.
 

I Interface aspects

II Social aspects



 

I Interface aspects

Scenario:
Prospective Student
John wonders which classes he will be taking next semester. As he browses, the EI site, his attention is caught by the title "Professionalism in computing" which seems to evoke that the corresponding course will deal with concrete applications of computer science. After having read the numerous comments contained on this page, he hesitates for a moment and chooses the link "Professionalism Home Pages". The first thing he sees is then an interesting description of the course. Eager to know more about it, he clicks the Syllabus link. Then following his curiosity he goes through the assignment pages and other miscellaneous pages and realizes he is lost. So he returns to the home page and checks that the course outline corresponds to what he wants. Being satisfied and curious to know about the books required by this course, he spends some time in the textbook and Reading section. As he is about to leave, he remembers the link to the career page. Since the career classes represents at least one third of the course, he decides to have a look at this page. It looks like a complete different place!
 
Claims Analysis:
Home page
Not very appealing: no logo, a lot of text.

This page with its numerous links seems very messy which is sad since according to the survey 80% of the students use this page as their primary entry point.

 

Exploration is often more depth oriented than breadth oriented

Pages are not overloaded and their content can be oversewed quickly.

Need to travel through many pages and the user gets lost easily.

The site gets larger and it becomes easier to miss a page that might be important (the survey points out that 90% in average of the students acknowledge that they haven't visited all the pages and links).

Table of contents
First contact with the page is the overview of the course.

References overloads the page and should be on another page.

Course outline and the Syllabus pages
Quite complete and contains numerous links.

Very dense, hard to read.

Pages well structured but should use more images to stress certain points (Instead of using the underlining style).

Textbooks and readings
Offers an overview of the book by listing its chapters.

List of the different references of books is not easy to read.

Use of the underlined style
Stresses words to lend emphasis.

Causes confusion as links are represented the same way.
 

Careers Page
Proposes a few interesting links to sites related with careers.

A huge long page (the syllabus, the calendar, the professor's information are gathered on the same page).

  It looks like a draft: no image, a very simple style.

  The design is completely inconsistent with the Professionalism in computing pages.

 
 
Scenario:
Class student
Jane needs to prepare for her next class. She quickly goes to the "Table of Contents" and clicks the "calendar" link. Then she clicks on the link proposed at the intersection of the Monday column and the ‘9/08 week’ row. She arrives on the "Graphical Presentation" page and reads its contents. She now remembers she hasn't participated in the class debate. She checks the debate guidelines and once she has understood fully the requirements she clicks on the debate link in the "calendar" page and is the Debate site is loaded. She then reviews the subject of the week and the comments/ arguments made by her classmates and gives her opinion.
 

Claims Analysis:
Announcement available only by way of the list server

The information is provided to the student without him having to look for it.

Very frustrating not to find the announcements on line.

Site seems static and does not encourage the student to come back to visit it (more than 60% of the students doesn't check into the CS 3604 class WWW more than once a week, which is a lot for a Web oriented course).

 

Table of contents

Short list of links well chosen.

Big logo takes room.

Overview should be on another page to save time scrolling through the page.
 

 
Calendar
Rich source of links: all the lectures and information seem to be accessible from this page.

Alternate colors to make the table easier to read.

Little overview of the semester would be welcome as shortcuts.

Maybe too many links, it is not clear if two following lines refers to the same link or to two different links.

 

Debates link in Calendar page

Shortcut to the debate pages.

Links in this page point all to the same location.

 

Images
Good in context, most of them funny (85% of the students acknowledge that images make the pages look more attractive and eye catching).

Few images in the online course.

Becomes tedious for a regular visitor.

 

Debate Guidelines

Several paragraphs force to read all.

No index that offers an overview. If this had been available it would have saved the student time when he came back later to obtain get some details that he missed out on previously .

There should be a link to this page in the debate section.

Debate
There are different presentations for outside viewers (no visible author name, no way to participate).

A tree structure gives relations between the positions.

It is hard to have an overview of the outcome of the current debate: see how many people agree/disagree, etc..

There may be some way to sort the answer by key words or shorter description.

Ambiguity about the Yes/No answer: it is not clear if a 'yes' refers to the main theme of the debate or the last position. Moreover, 'Yes' or 'No' is a little binary and there may be some intermediate positions.

The date indicated hasn't much sense.

The story on which the debate is based  takes room and there should be another page accessible with a link.
 

 

II Social aspects

Scenario:
A new student has enrolled for CS3604 and decides to look up the web page for information on the prerequisites, course format, textbooks, assignments, deadlines etc. He would like to see what the course work entails so he can start reading up on the material before the term starts. He also hopes that he will find information on the textbooks for the course to purchase them from his local book depot.
The student pulls up the homage, clicks on courses, and selects CS3604. He begins scanning the page, the image catches his attention immediately and he notes that CS3604 cannot be used as a CS minor or as a higher level course for a potential internal transfer student. He proceeds on to the other links hoping that he will be able to get a 'feel' of what the subject entails.
Claims Analysis:
   Immediate Impressions of the Professionalism homage
  The image is appropriately chosen and conveys the message across to the student effectively providing

  Indexing into the homage at the point required is straightforward.

  But some information that is too small to have its own link have been put under other links that make  it difficult to find.

  The information on similar courses taught in other universities may not always be of use to the average student.

 
Prerequisites
The prerequisites for the course are listed in the syllabus page which makes it difficult to find as one would not expect it to be under the syllabus link.
 
Information about the textbooks for the course   Format of the course
This is easily available from the assignment calendar.

This gives a student an idea of how much of work needs to be put in and the deadlines by which he must have it done by.

This provides an opportunity for a student to plan ahead and work ahead to prevent the last minute jams that we are all so familiar with.

But the course may seem very intensive and rigid.

 

Assignments

The different types of assignments are available to the student
 
Hints on assignments are available here
 
But, the number and nature of assignments might put off a less motivated student .
 

Course policies

Portfolios
The text makes the concept of portfolios easy to understand.

They motivate a student to work hard on every assignment since he knows that his grade depends on his portfolio.

The importance of class participation is stressed clearly and his participation in class debates is also crucial. This is driven home in no uncertain terms by the requirement that the student needs to attach printouts of the pages in which he has contributed to the debate. This would motivate him to participate actively.

But, the portfolio involves a lot of work to be done consistently.

Journals A readymade format for the journal is available

An example journal is available online

It may be difficult for some students to express themselves freely knowing that their comments are available on the net for anyone and everyone to see.

  It is difficult to remember and note down the exact sequence of steps taken during the process of completing assignment.

Online Debates
Having debates online gives an outsider (new student) an immediate view of what he would need to do and help him get familiarized with the format.

The structure of the debate gives a student ample time to prepare for the debate (Friday to Friday noon of the following week)

This structure enables a student to prepare himself in depth on a particular topic, if he feels his knowledge is not sufficient enough to make a sensible observation. This is not possible in a conventional debate.

This method attains the goal of getting the student to read through the matter well.

A student may participate in the debate even though he may be away from school by simply accessing the site

Having an online debate put the emphasis on subject matter rather than on presentation skills.

The system of granting a student double credit if his arguments have a reference or are based on a quotation provides motivation for the student to read the subject matter with close attention and apply what he has read to a variety of situations.

But, this means that a student must have access to a computer to participate in the debate.

But, the break in the debate process may cause the student to lose track of his thread of thought and may also cause him to lose interest in the debate.

If a student's argument is incorrectly worded, it is comparatively difficult to correct his stand , since it might come to his notice only after other students have posted their comments on it. This means of clarifying is messy as compared to the conventional means.

 
Review
The guidelines for the review are very clear. This gives a student a very well defined framework to work in, which helps concentrate on the subject matter rather than on bothering about the problem boundaries.

But this could also inhibit a student's creativity by forcing him to confine himself only to the bounds set by the teacher.

Resources
The resources present on the net are extremely helpful.

They are easily accessible.

Sections of the material that are required can be printed out as and when required.

But, searching the resources for particular information is time consuming.


,,