Performance Measurements: Email | Performance Measurements: Web Browsing
Voice vs. keyboard/mouse
control
Expert Performance measurements
Performance Measurements: Email
Methodology
Voice strategy
Keyboard & mouse strategy
Measurements
Types of errors:
Voice recognition via DragonDictate |
Keyboard & Mouse |
|||||
| Trial | Time (sec) |
Recognition Errors |
Navigation Errors |
Time (sec) |
Typographics |
Navigation Errors |
| 1 | 120 |
1 |
2 |
55 |
4 |
|
| 2 | 98 |
1 |
2 |
52 |
3 |
|
| 3 | 86 |
50 |
2 |
|||
| 4 | 93 |
1 |
53 |
2 |
||
| 5 | 103 |
2 |
1 |
54 |
2 |
|
| 6 | 123 |
2 |
1 |
57 |
4 |
|
| 7 | 88 |
52 |
2 |
|||
| 8 | 109 |
3 |
1 |
48 |
1 |
|
| 9 | 93 |
1 |
53 |
1 |
1 |
|
| 10 | 101 |
2 |
52 |
3 |
||
| Mean | 101.4 |
1.20 |
0.80 |
52.6 |
2.40 |
0.10 |
| St Dev | 12.66 |
1.03 |
0.80 |
2.50 |
1.07 |
0.32 |
Comments
Performance Measurements: Web Browsing
Methodology
To compare the performance of voice control and speech control, we measured the time each method required to perform the following task:
Open a web browser and navigate to Yahoos search page. Search for the Adobe home page, navigate to the page, complete a registration form, and initiate a download of the Acrobat reader program.
For each method, we performed the task ten times and recorded time required along with relevant errors. A recognition error occurred when DragonDictate incorrectly recognized a word and typed it or incorrectly recognized a command and executed it. A navigation error occurred whenever the user incorrectly directed the mouse pointer. A typographical error occurred whenever the user misspelled a word.
Voice strategy
Keyboard & mouse strategy
Measurements
Voice recognition via DragonDictate |
Keyboard & Mouse |
|||||
| Trial | Time (sec) | Recognition Errors | Navigation Errors | Time (sec) | Typographics | Navigation Errors |
| 1 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 118 | 3 | 0 |
| 2 | 303 | 3 | 1 | 109 | 2 | 0 |
| 3 | 343 | 3 | 1 | 95 | 2 | 0 |
| 4 | 200 | 1 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 198 | 0 | 1 | 96 | 4 | 0 |
| 6 | 228 | 3 | 0 | 90 | 5 | 0 |
| 7 | 197 | 0 | 0 | 99 | 2 | 0 |
| 8 | 259 | 5 | 0 | 93 | 2 | 0 |
| 9 | 176 | 1 | 0 | 83 | 2 | 0 |
| 10 | 200 | 0 | 2 | 95 | 3 | 0 |
| Mean | 229.60 | 1.50 | 0.50 | 97.20 | 2.50 | 0 |
| St Dev | 52.17 | 1.63 | 0.67 | 9.31 | 1.28 | 0 |
Comments
We discovered two main bottlenecks with the voice control: mouse movement and form completion. Mouse control is done via a numbered tic-tac-toe grid on the screen. Calling a number moves the pointer to the center of the specified sector which is then subdivided into nine more sectors. This process continues until the pointer reaches the desired location. Every mouse movement must be controlled in this cumbersome manner. Form completion was hindered by the necessity of swapping between [Command Mode] and [Dictate Mode]. This was necessary in order to move between fields with the [Tab] command.
Another significant factor in the speed of the voice control was recognition. A quick glance at the data shows that every trial with a time exceeding 200 seconds had at least 3 recognition errors. In contrast to this, typographical errors had little overall effect on the times measured with mouse and keyboard control. This seems to indicate that voice recognition errors are more time-consuming than typographical errors.
In general, the Internet task was performed over twice as fast with the keyboard and mouse control. This method also generated more consistent results than the voice control. The inconsistent times of the voice control are to be expected since error recovery is more time-consuming.