Back to the Main Page

Back to Course Pack References

The following references are available in the reserve desk at the Newman Library (listed under "J. M. Carroll").

1. Introduction

• Bannon, L. J. 1993. From Human Factors to Human Actors: The Role of Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction Studies in System Design. In Baecker. R. M. et all. Readings in Human Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000. Kaufmann.
• Barnard, P. 1993. The Contributions of Applied Cognitive Psycology to the Study of Human-Computer Interaction. In Baecker. R. M. et all. Readings in Human Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000. Kaufmann.
• Barnard, P. 1992. Bridging between Basic Theories and the Artifacts of Human-Computer Interaction. In Carroll, J. M. (ed.) Designing Interaction . Cambridge Series on Human-Computer Interaction. pp. 113-??.
• Carroll, J. M. & Rosson, M. B. 1992. Getting Around the Task-Artifact Cycle: How to Make Claims and Design by Scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, v.10, no.2 New York: Association of Computer Machinery. pp. 181-212.
• Carroll, J. M., Kellogg, W. A. & Rosson, M. B. 1992. The Task-Artifact Cycle. In Carroll, J. M. (ed.) Designing Interaction. Cambridge Series on Human-Computer Interaction. p. 74
• Hammond, N., Gardiner, M. M., Christie, B. & Marshall, C. 1987 In Gardiner, M. M. & Christie, B. (eds.) Applying Cognitive Psychology to User-Interface Design.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
• Norman, D. A. Cognitive Engineering. 1986. In D.A. Norman & S.W Draper (ed.), User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. pp. 31-61.

2. Fitts' Law:

• MacKenzie, S. 1992. Movement Time Prediction in Human-Computer Interfaces. In Baecker. R. M. et all. Readings in Human Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000.Kaufmann. pp. 483

3. GOMS:

• John, B. E. 1995. Why GOMS? Interactions magazine. Oct., pp.81-90
• Peck, V. A. & John, B. E. 1992. Browser-Soar: A Computational Model of a Highly Interactive Task. ACM Proceedings on Computer-Human Interaction. New York: Association of Computer Machinery. pp. 165.
• Moran, T. P. 1981. The Command Language Grammar: a representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.15, pp. 3-50.
• Olson, J. R. & Olson, G. M. 1990. The Growth of Cognitive Modeling in Human- Computer Interaction since GOMS. Human Computer Interaction, v. 5 . Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum. pp. 221-265
• Polson, P. G. & Lewis, C. H. 1990. Theory-Based Design for Easily Learned Interfaces. Human Computer Interaction, v. 5, .Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum. pp. 221-265.
• Kieras, D. E. 1988. Towards a Practical GOMS Model Methodology for User Interface Design. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction M. Helander (ed.) North-Holland.
• Kieras, D. E. 1985. An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. Int J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 22. London: Academic Press Inc, pp. 365-394
• Card, K. S. & Moran, Thomas P., Newell, A. 1980. The Keystroke-Level Model for User Performance Time with Interactive Systems. Communications of the ACM. v. 23, no. 7New York, NY: Association of Computer Machinery.

4. Opportunism / Direct Manipulation

• Norman, D. A. 1990. Commentary: Human Error and the Design of Computer Systems. Communications of the ACM. v. 33, no. 1 New York, NY: Association of Computer Machinery
• Norman, D. A. 1981. Categorization of Action Slips. Psychological Review, v. 28, no. 1.A. P. Association.

5. Metaphors and Task Knowledge:

• Carroll, J. M., Mack, R. L, & Kellogg, W. A. 1988. Interface Metaphors and User Interface Design. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction Ch. 3 M. Helander (ed.), North-Holland.
• Hartson, H. R. & Hix, D. 1992. Techniques for Representing User Interaction Designs. Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product & Process. Ch. 6 Wiley.
• Hartson, H. R. & Hix, D. 1992. More on Using the User Action Notation. Ch. 7 Wiley.

6. Work Activity:

• Bannon, L. J. & Bodker, S. 1992. Beyond the Interface: Encountering Artifacts in Use. In Carroll, J. M. (ed.) Designing Interaction. Ch. 12 Cambridge Series on Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge.

7. Overview, Reviews and Criticisms:

• Butler, K. et all, 1989. Report on the Workshop on Analytical Models: Predicting the Complexity of Human-Computer Interaction. SIGCHI Bulleting, V.20, No. 4. ACM.
• Young, R. et all, 1989. How would your favourite user model cope with these scenarios? SIGCHI Bulleting, V.20, No. 4. ACM
• Johnson, P. & Johnson, H., Practical and Theoretical Aspects of Human Computer Interaction.

Back to the Main Page