Who is hurt by current practices?

Anyone who slaps a "this page is best viewed with Browser X" label on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another computer, another word processor, or another network.
[Tim Berners-Lee in Technology Review, July 1996]


Use of proprietary HTML coding that is hardware or software specific can deprive seekers of information. The ulitimate test of who might be hurt is to determine who the audience is. If the documents under consideration are personal vanity pages, it might be appropriate to use non standard HTML. If the documents are intended for an Intranet in which the software and hardware can be dictated and supplied, then anything goes. If the information is critical to the world it would be best to use the simplest, most widely supported HTML.

Who is being left out?

Relying heavily on graphics and non-standard markup, and not providing text/plain HTML alternatives leaves out many users.

Abigails WWW dream [1] is a fine story that illustrates the power of the web as a resource that must be accessible to everyone.

W3C's Pages on Disabilities[2]

[1]http://www.edbo.com/abigail/WWW/dream.htm
[2]http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Disabilities/


Table of Contents
ps